Source: Theatlantic
This interview reveals how Twitter’s foundational commitment to free-speech absolutism wasn’t incidental but structural—a deliberate choice that starved trust and safety resources and shaped the platform’s entire trajectory toward toxicity and misinformation. The “monster” framing suggests a growing reckoning among tech insiders that platform design choices made in the name of openness have real downstream consequences for user experience and public discourse. For the consumer, this matters because it shows how early ideological commitments at platforms calcify into nearly immovable infrastructure, making reform far harder than prevention would have been.